|
Post by The Unknown Poster on Jul 2, 2006 12:24:29 GMT -5
So you still think they will only win one more game this season?
|
|
|
Post by kj79 on Jul 2, 2006 14:30:13 GMT -5
WHAT A GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whose this Ricky Ray guy anyway?
|
|
|
Post by yogi on Jul 2, 2006 18:29:44 GMT -5
I've changed my prediction. I now believe they'll finish with 2 wins, 16 losses. The Bombers will have yet another dreadful year I'm afraid... If I'm wrong, I will personally pay each member of the board $25.00 well, they're halfway there ;D, to bad this guy got banned cause my pocket wouldn't be opposed to having an extra $25 in it i wish armageddon was still here, he owes me $25 now! well i suppose they could still lose their next 15, but i doubt it. armageddon if you've made another account, pay up now
|
|
|
Post by simplesimon on Jul 2, 2006 20:54:55 GMT -5
WHAT A GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whose this Ricky Ray guy anyway? Ray did surprisingly well. 25 of 33 for 352 yds. The one interception was still on target. Edmonton basically had no secondary. This cost them the game.
|
|
|
Post by kj79 on Jul 2, 2006 22:40:39 GMT -5
WHAT A GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whose this Ricky Ray guy anyway? Ray did surprisingly well. 25 of 33 for 352 yds. The one interception was still on target. Edmonton basically had no secondary. This cost them the game. Ray did awesome not scoring any points from the middle of the second quarter, yup what-a-game, especially that dropped snap from the one yard line, which took any momentum away, or how about third and one and he can't get one yard. In the cfl they give a yard off the line, sure he had some numbers but he couldn't put the ball in the endzone more than once. In the cfl if you don't get at least 20 you're in trouble.
|
|
|
Post by yogi on Jul 3, 2006 12:29:37 GMT -5
WHAT A GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whose this Ricky Ray guy anyway? Ray did surprisingly well. 25 of 33 for 352 yds. The one interception was still on target. Edmonton basically had no secondary. This cost them the game. bend but not break. his stats looked better than his actual performance. edmontons a pass heavy offence too, good tackling by the secondary is the reasons those stats didn't affect the outcome of the game
|
|
|
Post by yogi on Jul 28, 2006 22:49:08 GMT -5
WOW this guy was so wrong, we've more than doubled his second estimate of 2 wins on the season, and we've now matched our win total of 2005! BOMBERS RULE!
|
|
|
Post by joelzillmanwpg on Jul 29, 2006 0:19:48 GMT -5
I've changed my prediction. I now believe they'll finish with 2 wins, 16 losses. The Bombers will have yet another dreadful year I'm afraid... If I'm wrong, I will personally pay each member of the board $25.00 I can use that $25.00 right about now. It would be my drinking money for tomorrow night
|
|
|
Post by Kenny S on Jul 29, 2006 10:37:55 GMT -5
I've changed my prediction. I now believe they'll finish with 2 wins, 16 losses. The Bombers will have yet another dreadful year I'm afraid... If I'm wrong, I will personally pay each member of the board $25.00 I can use that $25.00 right about now. It would be my drinking money for tomorrow night Me too.
|
|
|
Post by joelzillmanwpg on Jul 29, 2006 21:45:38 GMT -5
Since there are 1,099 members of this forum, Jason owes us a whopping $27,475.00!!!
Fork it over! ;D
|
|
|
Post by joelzillmanwpg on Aug 2, 2006 22:05:24 GMT -5
I predict the Bombers will finish with 3 wins and 15 losses this year. We've played dreadful in the exhibition games... "exhibition means nothing" you say? Alright... but you won't be saying that on Friday night after the Alouettes have embarrassed us. I've learned it's much better to be a pessimist if you're a Bomber fan. Yes, I know they'll probably finish better than 3-15. But the only way to be pleasantly surprised when the season is done is to assume they'll do horribly this year ;D Worst....post....ever!!!
|
|
|
Post by Yar on Aug 4, 2006 16:52:09 GMT -5
sweet...a very easy 25.00 bucks....im honestly not that surprised by our record. its a compeltely different team this year and they are proving it.
|
|
|
Post by yogi on Aug 4, 2006 22:42:50 GMT -5
but with no stegall, no roberts, and no glenn, we got beat. i'm not upset, just shows that those 3 guys are big in our team. ticats got another lucky unearned win, congrats to their luck
|
|
|
Post by couchpotato on Aug 4, 2006 23:27:32 GMT -5
ticats didn't play very well.
i was impressed with ranek though.
|
|
|
Post by Yar on Aug 8, 2006 22:41:22 GMT -5
ranek single handedly won it for the tabbies. had glenn still been in there, our offense would have been able to keep up and given our defense a break.
|
|
|
Post by couchpotato on Aug 9, 2006 21:25:34 GMT -5
I'm looking forward to tomorrow's game versus the Lions. I think that Quinn could fill in wonderfully for the injured Glenn. Banks, and Michna looked non-existent in the last game against the Ti-Cats. Word going around is that Dickenson isn't playing for the Leo's, that could help our cause a great deal.......
|
|
|
Post by jetbloodisback on Aug 15, 2006 18:35:13 GMT -5
If Baker play's like he can and with Milt Stegal comming back from injury soon our recievers should be slick. Stegal, Baker, Brazell, and Thurman shounds good. Hopefully Baker dosent cause any problems in the dressing room. I think the signing of Baker is gonna be alot bigger then anyone thinks. I just hope he dosen't dissapoint.
|
|