|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 7, 2011 8:18:38 GMT -5
Matrix - ça va?
Je suis très intéressant pour entendre que Bettman pourrait dire dans son émission de radio hebdomadaire à quatre heures (ET) cet après-midi.
Vous pouvez écouter vivants sur le site Internet.
Allez Jets! Allez Nordiques! Faites-le huit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 7, 2011 8:19:21 GMT -5
I posted the English of what I said on the previous posting, which happens to be at the end of the previous page.
|
|
|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 7, 2011 8:31:05 GMT -5
Je ne commence pas de rumeur. Je n'ai pas d'informations.
Just to be clear - I am not starting a rumour - I don't have any information.
|
|
|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 7, 2011 9:18:50 GMT -5
Matrix, est-ce qu'il est plus correct de dire <<Faisez-le huit>> Ou, <<Le Faisons huit>>?
English tr. - Matrix, is it more correct to say "Make it eight" [2 different variations in French].
|
|
|
|
Post by matrix on Apr 7, 2011 9:29:26 GMT -5
hey swervinmervin123 ! Thank you for the information about Bettman  There is no real translation for the "make it 8" "Faites-le huit" is better but it doesn't sound very good in french hehe I don't know what would be the best translation... You should keep it in english  |
|
|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 7, 2011 11:16:20 GMT -5
"Make it 8" has a nice ring to it in English, with the rhyme! |
|
|
|
Post by mann1986 on Apr 7, 2011 11:40:30 GMT -5
didn't a report just come out stating the tv deals that are locked up with the Canadiens are interfering, and that the first oppertunity for NHL return to Quebec City would be 2012-2013, after the contract expires?
|
|
|
|
Post by matrix on Apr 7, 2011 11:53:10 GMT -5
didn't a report just come out stating the tv deals that are locked up with the Canadiens are interfering, and that the first oppertunity for NHL return to Quebec City would be 2012-2013, after the contract expires? Yeah, it is from "NHLwiki" on twitter, however we don't know if it is true or not. |
|
|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 7, 2011 12:44:58 GMT -5
For what it's worth, my opinion is that some issues can be solved by money, and some issues can be solved by time. If the NHL needs another location for 2011, it may be possible to negotiate a settlement on TV rights issues, maybe. Or, worst case, the Quebec team may have to simply "lose out" on the TV rights issue for 1 year. Each party (QC, Mtl. and NHL) would have to assess whether or not that would work for them, and what the right price is in the circumstances.
I must say (to be honest) that I don't know anything about regional TV in Quebec. I'm just saying that some issues can be solved by money or by time, and that there is a cost-benefit analysis for almost any business issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by matrix on Apr 8, 2011 7:31:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mann1986 on Apr 8, 2011 17:44:03 GMT -5
whether the thrashers or coyotes, If Quebec approached the NHL and said were building a 17000+ areana in quebec, wouldn't it make sense for a organization that has revenue sharing to maximize the potential of a situation by choosing QC as the next city?, by all means I want Winnipeg to get a team first and think we deserve it, but Bettman does what he wants, i'm sure he lives by the rule "Money talks"i'm just worried that with every passing day Quebec gets one step closer, and we float, I trust our ownership team, but I want to throw out the unbiased opinion that Quebec MAY be the better option........but I hope it doesn't come down to this, i'm just frustrated another friday/another week goes by with minimum news.
|
|
|
|
Post by iliketherangers on Apr 8, 2011 17:56:18 GMT -5
whether the thrashers or coyotes, If Quebec approached the NHL and said were building a 17000+ areana in quebec, wouldn't it make sense for a organization that has revenue sharing to maximize the potential of a situation by choosing QC as the next city?, by all means I want Winnipeg to get a team first and think we deserve it, but Bettman does what he wants, i'm sure he lives by the rule "Money talks"i'm just worried that with every passing day Quebec gets one step closer, and we float, I trust our ownership team, but I want to throw out the unbiased opinion that Quebec MAY be the better option........but I hope it doesn't come down to this, i'm just frustrated another friday/another week goes by with minimum news. well, first of all, that arena is 3-4 years away. also, i think mts centre can expand to 15,500. I think winnipeg is more prepared right now. |
|
|
|
Post by matrix on Apr 8, 2011 20:17:20 GMT -5
whether the thrashers or coyotes, If Quebec approached the NHL and said were building a 17000+ areana in quebec, wouldn't it make sense for a organization that has revenue sharing to maximize the potential of a situation by choosing QC as the next city?, by all means I want Winnipeg to get a team first and think we deserve it, but Bettman does what he wants, i'm sure he lives by the rule "Money talks"i'm just worried that with every passing day Quebec gets one step closer, and we float, I trust our ownership team, but I want to throw out the unbiased opinion that Quebec MAY be the better option........but I hope it doesn't come down to this, i'm just frustrated another friday/another week goes by with minimum news. Don't worry, your team is coming in a few weeks |
|
|
|
Post by jetsnnordiquesfan on Apr 8, 2011 21:00:50 GMT -5
Unless the Coyotes win the stanley cup and make everyone wait until mid June or so... X.x
|
|
|
|
Post by mrconfusion87 on Apr 11, 2011 20:35:59 GMT -5
I'm from Quebec (but I cheer for the habs, never been a fan of the Nords) and I do think that the Trashers will go to Quebec, but maybe not this year. I think you guys in Winnipeg deserve to have a team before Quebec because everything is ready in Winnipeg. I really enjoy coming here reading the board like a soap opera. Hope the Coyotes die and they come back to Canada! Welcome! Good to know there are many Quebecois here on this board... Anyway I do hope the Nords come back too EVENTUALLY (after the Peg) so Le Hab and the Nords can slug it out 6x a year minimum... |
|
|
|
Post by swervinmervin123 on Apr 11, 2011 21:47:51 GMT -5
Make it 8!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by thanatos on Apr 13, 2011 4:55:05 GMT -5
I won't be surprised if within the next 2 years quebec and the peg have their teams...it's only a matter of time now  |
|
|
|
Post by shanehoopfer on Apr 14, 2011 2:23:32 GMT -5
If it is Phoenix that moves to Winnipeg which it now looks like then they have to deal with Atlanta.
I'm sure Winnipeg was the original plan but with that out the window if they can't find local buyers the team is going to have to move somewhere wont it?
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Jiffy~ on Apr 14, 2011 19:31:18 GMT -5
I have a question, lets say for shits and giggles that coyotes actually make it and win the cup, would that change anything....  ? (would they be saved?) |
|
|
|
Post by mrconfusion87 on Apr 14, 2011 22:21:23 GMT -5
I have a question, lets say for shits and giggles that coyotes actually make it and win the cup, would that change anything.... ? (would they be saved?) Hehehe!  Anyways, someone who still is planning to buy them in that scenario is still a SUCKER! Cuz once they start sucking again, "fans" will abandon the Yotes and treat it like the Ancient Hebrews treated their lepers and tax collectors and they'll be back to square one! ;D |
|
? (would they be saved?)
Anyways, someone who still is planning to buy them in that scenario is still a SUCKER! Cuz once they start sucking again, "fans" will abandon the Yotes and treat it like the Ancient Hebrews treated their lepers and tax collectors and they'll be back to square one! ;D