|
Post by blackthorne on Apr 26, 2005 14:17:06 GMT -5
Here's my beef lately: We don't need a $20 million dollar team payroll.
GIVE WINNIPEG MORE CREDIT.
I've thought of revenue sources/streams that Calgary, Edmonton and Ottawa haven't even dreamed about.
Sure, we have the smallest arena capacity and among the fewest luxury suites, but in the 21st century NHL that's irrelevant.
We can make even more money than the Flames and Oilers do, if we have ambitious owners. Some people on here, members of the media, True North/Moose executives seem completely clueless when they suggest Winnipeg would have to have the lowest team payroll in the NHL.
It's because we have so many hockey fans in this city and this province that make revenue sources aside from ticket sales so vital - and will make them so sought-after.
Who says Winnipeg can't have a team payroll of $35 million? Tell me why we can't. The Oilers have a team payroll of $35 million, they made money last year, and they don't even have A QUARTER of the revenue spinoffs that we could potentially have here in Winnipeg!
What saddens (and angers) me is the fact that the bigwigs at True North likely have no clue about them. I know I rant a lot on here about anything and everything regarding the "Return of the Jets", but the most important thing to me has always been for the "key people" in this to realize how much money they could make by being part-owners of an NHL team in Winnipeg.
Don't say we'd need a very low payroll to compete and be profitable, because it's not true.
I roll my eyes whenever someone says "Winnipeg would need the lowest payroll in the NHL" or "It must be lower than $30 million if we have any hope."
|
|
|
Post by hatrick007 on Apr 26, 2005 17:59:53 GMT -5
It would need to be under 30M to have good ticket prices.
|
|
|
Post by dreamcatcher on Apr 27, 2005 9:17:46 GMT -5
Yup. Ticket prices will play into the continual success of an NHL franchise in this city. Sources of revenue, although unending and excellent ideas, are not something a new ownership group will look at, until everything else is in place.
|
|
|
Post by USApegger on Apr 27, 2005 12:03:48 GMT -5
Sources of revenue, although unending and excellent ideas, are not something a new ownership group will look at, until everything else is in place. I think a potential new ownership group would be looking at all sources of revenue before making any type of investment
|
|
|
Post by blackthorne on Apr 27, 2005 19:09:23 GMT -5
Exactly. If they're smart.
So Dreamcatcher I don't know what you're talking about...
|
|
|
Post by bison33 on Jun 3, 2005 21:45:06 GMT -5
Here's my beef lately: We don't need a $20 million dollar team payroll. Who says Winnipeg can't have a team payroll of $35 million? Tell me why we can't. The Oilers have a team payroll of $35 million, they made money last year, and they don't even have A QUARTER of the revenue spinoffs that we could potentially have here in Winnipeg! Explain how Winnipeg has potentially 75% more money making possibilities? Some of your threads for revenue seems to have Edmonton doing a few of them...credit card, fanboni...come on BT wake up and check into the real world, many of these schemes you toss out may pay for a couple of 3rd liners.....and your right, we don't neeed a 20mil payroll...more like 32mil.
|
|
|
Post by blackthorne on Jun 3, 2005 22:34:25 GMT -5
There are FIVE PAGES of revenue sources here (in case you didn't notice).
Edmonton doesn't use MANY of them.
Now can you post ONCE on this blasted msg. board without attacking or criticizing me?
|
|
|
Post by hatrick007 on Jun 4, 2005 2:13:34 GMT -5
There are five pages, although some of them are repeat, and some would not make more than a 5 digit figure, paying for a couple of 3rd liners is still alot of money.
Bison, there are many revenue sources that the Oilers have not tried yet, however because of that it is not determined if/how much money each revenue source would make. BT means ( I think) that there are many revenue sources that Edmonton has not yet tried that we could try here. Edmonton may be able to use these as well.
However, people only have so much money to spend, so there is only a limited amount of dollars that the people of Winnipeg have to spend on these revenue sources since we are currently a town of 750,000. Many of these revenue sources may only break even or make a bit of money right now, but as the city grows closer to 1 million residents or more then revenue sources can start raking in even more cash, and there willl be an even higher demand for Jets, and thus more profits. That's my take on it anyways.
|
|
|
Post by blackthorne on Jun 4, 2005 2:24:45 GMT -5
Oh for God's sake... (BlackThorne bangs his head against a wall in frustration)
The revenue sources listed on these 5 pages (95% of them at least) apply to people WORLDWIDE - NOT just people in Winnipeg!
|
|
|
Post by hatrick007 on Jun 4, 2005 2:29:34 GMT -5
Oh for God's sake... (BlackThorne bangs his head against a wall in frustration) The revenue sources listed on these 5 pages (95% of them at least) apply to people WORLDWIDE - NOT just people in Winnipeg! Very true that some of them do apply, but the majority of any team's revenue comes from within the city. Sure we may have a few thousand people wanting to pay for these sources which is great, however theres only so many Jets fans out there.
|
|
|
Post by jason on Jan 25, 2006 13:43:18 GMT -5
Thought this deserves another look from posters
|
|
|
Post by joelzillmanwpg on Jan 26, 2006 23:06:42 GMT -5
Thought this deserves another look from posters (waits for sarcastic back massage from Jenna What's a sarcastic back massage?
|
|
|
Post by blackthorne on Jan 29, 2007 16:51:55 GMT -5
MODS: "Sticky" request
|
|